Comments on: Adobe CQ5 has arrived

By: Mark Polly

Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:22:16 +0000

Sorry to hear that. Often times implementation of the content templates can affect the usability of the site for authors. Also newer versions have addressed some problems that you make have encountered.

]]>

By: Lisa

Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:50:57 +0000

I found CQ5 to be not very user-friendly….

]]>

By: container verkauf

Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:26:06 +0000

I really like it when individuals come together and share views.
Great blog, continue the good work!

]]>

By: Mark Polly

Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:44:00 +0000

Yes, I’ve been able to deploy the CQ5 portlet on WebSphere Portal and display content from CQ5. It worked pretty easy on my demo site.

]]>

By: What the hell is Adobe CQ5? « Almost Humor

Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:53:30 +0000

[…] Adobe CQ5 review […]

]]>

By: Hemal

Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:41:28 +0000

After looking at the videos at Adobe’s website, I think CQ5 will surely be a vaiable option for large corporates. At the same time, I find it quite complex. it will not be as smooth on older browsers most of the large organizations are running. I know of some large organizations still running IE6!

I am hoping to get my hands on CQ5 some day soon. Thank you very much for your review, I now know what to expect from a demonstration that is set to happen soon for me.

]]>

By: Ronak

Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:23:41 +0000

how did it go? do you use IBM portal and CQ5 together? thanks

]]>

By: Lina Toll

Mon, 23 May 2011 14:21:48 +0000

We are moving off of IBM’s WCM to the CQ5 platform. It will be much better and easier to use.

]]>

By: Michael Porter

Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:16:32 +0000

You beat eWeek by one day. Here’s the link to eWeek’s review.
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Messaging-and-Collaboration/10-Ways-Adobe-Is-Transforming-Enterprise-Digital-Experiences-591898/?kc=EWKNLEAU03082011STR1

]]>